Madan Lal Dhingra was born on 1883 in Punjab, British India &
died on 1909 in Pentonville Prison, London, Britain, was an Indian
revolutionary freedom fighter.
While studying in England, he assassinated Sir William Hutt Curzon
Wyllie, a British official, hailed as one of the first acts of
revolution in the Indian independence movement in the 20th century.
Dhingra had to work as a clerk, a Tonga (horse-driven cart) puller, and a factory labourer.
Dhingra attempted to organise a union there, but was sacked. He worked
for sometime in Bombay, before acting upon the advice of his elder
brother and going to England for higher studies. In 1906, Madan Lal
departed for England to enroll at University College, London, to study
Mechanical Engineering. He was supported by his elder brother and some
nationalist activists in England.
Dhingra came into contact with noted Indian independence & political activists Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and Shyamji Krishna Varma, who were impressed by Dhingra’s perseverance and intense patriotism which turned his focus to the freedom
struggle. Savarkar believed in revolution by any means, and supposedly
gave Dhingra arms training, apart from membership in a secretive
society, the Abhinav Bharat Mandal. He was also a member of India House,
the base for Indian student political activity.
During this period, Savarkar, Dhingra and other student activists were enraged by the execution of freedom
fighters such as Khudiram Bose, Kanhai Lal Dutt, Satinder Pal and
Pandit Kanshi Ram in India. It is this event that is attributed by many
historians as having led Savarkar and Dhingra to exact direct revenge
upon the British.
On the evening of 1 July 1909, a large number of Indians and Englishmen had gathered to attend the annual day function of the Indian National Association. When Sir Curzon Wyllie, political aide-de-camp to the Secretary of State for India, entered the hall
with his wife, Dhingra fired five shots right at his face, four of
which hit their target. Cowasji Lalkaka, a Parsee doctor who tried to
save Sir Curzon, died of Madan Lal’s sixth and seventh bullets, which
the latter fired because Lalkaka caught hold of him.
Failing to commit suicide by turning his pistol on himself, Dhingra was arrested after a brief struggle.
Dhingra was tried in the Old Bailey on 23 July. He stated that he did
not regret killing of Curzon Wyllie as he had played his part in order
to set India free from the inhuman British rule. Also, that he had not
intended to kill Cowasji Lalkaka. He was sentenced to death. After the
judge announced his verdict, Dhingra is said to have stated, “I am proud
to have the honour of laying down my life for my country. But remember
we shall have our time in the days to come.” Contemporary press reports
record a somewhat different version. Dhingra was hanged on 17 August
1909. Given the somewhat arrogant comment he made upon hearing the
verdict, there is a further comment which is rarely mentioned. According
to John Laurence in A History of Capital Punishment on page 138, H. A.
Pierrepoint, his executioner gave him a long drop of eight feet, three
inches at the execution.
While he was being removed from the court,
he said to the Chief Justice- “Thank you, my Lord. I don’t care. I am
proud to have the honour of laying down my life for the cause of my
motherland.”
The Lord Chief Justice. Mr. Tindal Atkinson, although the course may
have seemed somewhat unusual, having regard to the nature of this crime
and the wicked attempt at justification in some quarters, I am very glad
you should have said that on behalf of the members of the family.
While most of the British press, and some liberal and moderate
Indians condemned Dhingra’s act, it nevertheless excited the Indian
community in England and back in India. Guy Aldred, the printer of The
Indian Sociologist was sentenced to twelve months hard labour. The
August issue of The Indian Sociologist had carried a story sympathetic
to Dhingra. Dhingra’s actions also inspired some in the Irish, who were
fighting their own struggle at the time.
Some modern historians claim that the trial was grossly unfair and
biased. Dhingra was not given a defence counsel (though this was at his
own request, in support of his contention that no British court had
authority to try him), and the entire process was completed in a single
day. Some legal experts claim that it was not the business of the court at the time to decide the time and location of execution.
At the time, Dhingra’s body was denied Hindu rites and was buried by
British authorities. His family having disowned him, the authorities
refused to turn over the body to Savarkar. Dhingra’s body was
accidentally found while authorities searched for the remains of Shaheed
Udham Singh, and re-patriated to India on 13 December 1976. Dhingra is
widely remembered in India today, and was an inspiration at the time to
revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh and Chandrasekhar Azad.
0 comments:
Post a Comment